Sten Vammen

1.3k citations
31 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Sten Vammen

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Sten Vammen
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 843
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 239
  • Microbiology 37
  • Surgery 231
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace S. Ockert with:
S. Ockert Germany
Maria Heger Austria
Margot Nash Australia
Jim Lordan United Kingdom
R Luosto Finland
Richard Sim Singapore
Eric Lo United States
Takafumi Honda Japan
M. Yashiro Japan
Joon M. Park United States
Sten Vammen relative to S. Ockert Germany S. Ockert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
S. Ockert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Vammen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Vammen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Vammen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Vammen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Vammen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Vammen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Vammen. The network helps show where Sten Vammen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Sten Vammen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Vammen Line = papers co-authored together Sten Vammen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999170
2 2000129
3 2001128
4 2000101
5 200197
6 200171
7 200067
8 200063
9 199942
10 200139
11 200119
12
A comparative study of iliac and abdominal aortic aneurysms.
200014
13 200012
14 201411
15 200211
16 19988
17 19998
18 19987
19 20147
20
[Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Results from a randomized screening trial].
20036

About Sten Vammen

Sten Vammen is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (20 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Case Reports on Hematomas (3 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (843 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (239 citations), Microbiology (37 citations), Surgery (231 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Sten Vammen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jes S. Lindholt, H Fasting, E W Henneberg, Lene Heickendorff, Svend Juul, Lars Østergaard, Niels H. H. Heegaard, Andrew W. Bradbury, Peter R. Hoskins and Katie A. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, British journal of surgery, Foot & Ankle International, The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact