Sten Holm
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 35
- Pharmacology 31
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 31
- Co-authors
- Tommy Hansson (12 shared papers)Allison M. Kaigle (8 shared papers)Alf Nachemson (4 shared papers)Aage Indahl (6 shared papers)Kjell Olmarker (6 shared papers)Allison Kaigle Holm (7 shared papers)Paul W. Hodges (4 shared papers)Björn Rydevik (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Spine (19 papers)Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences (4 papers)Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (3 papers)Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (2 papers)Archives of Oral Biology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
Sten Holm
51 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Pharmacology 2.4k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.2k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 341
- Equine 56
- Surgery 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Sten Holm
This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Holm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Holm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Holm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Holm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Holm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Holm. The network helps show where Sten Holm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Holm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 317 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 249 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 192 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 187 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 180 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 170 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 159 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 151 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 150 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 149 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 143 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 111 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 85 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 67 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 62 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 62 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 61 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 57 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 55 |
About Sten Holm
Sten Holm is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Small Animals and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 51 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (35 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (31 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (8 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (3 papers) and Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.4k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.2k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (341 citations), Equine (56 citations) and Surgery (1.4k citations). Sten Holm has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Tommy Hansson, Allison M. Kaigle, Alf Nachemson, Aage Indahl, Kjell Olmarker, Allison Kaigle Holm, Paul W. Hodges, Björn Rydevik, Lars Ekström and O. Reikerås. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Journal of Orthopaedic Research® and Archives of Oral Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.