Sten Hanke

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Sten Hanke's Hit Papers

Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signal Analysis: A Review 2019 · 411 citations
4110+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Sten Hanke
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 301
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 448
  • Human-Computer Interaction 105
  • Demography 133
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 210
Replace Bruno Bouchard with:
Bruno Bouchard Canada
Evdokimos Konstantinidis Greece
Ângelo Costa Portugal
Thomas Kirste Germany
Ramón Hervás Spain
Dirk Colbry United States
Hélène Pigot Canada
Bart Peintner United States
Asier Aztiria Spain
Elena Mugellini Switzerland
Sten Hanke relative to Bruno Bouchard Canada Bruno Bouchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Bruno Bouchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Hanke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Hanke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Hanke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Hanke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Hanke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Hanke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Hanke. The network helps show where Sten Hanke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Hanke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Hanke Line = papers co-authored together Sten Hanke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signal Analysis: A Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2019411
2 2017156
3 201176
4 201767
5 201847
6 201237
7 201132
8 201031
9 200930
10 201928
11 201827
12 201721
13 202015
14 202114
15 201514
16 201713
17 202212
18 200711
19 201910
20 202410

About Sten Hanke

Sten Hanke is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Demography, Artificial Intelligence and Social Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (19 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (4 papers), IoT-based Smart Home Systems (4 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (301 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (448 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (105 citations), Demography (133 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (210 citations). Sten Hanke has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Greece and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Ley, Johannes Kropf, Andreas Holzinger, Deepika Singh, Erinç Merdivan, Matthieu Geist, Ismini Psychoula, Christopher Clemens Mayer, Reiner Wichert and Francesco Furfari. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Medical Informatics, Smart Cities, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact