Stefanie Graefe

411 citations
24 papers · 197 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Stefanie Graefe

18 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Stefanie Graefe
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 18
  • Biophysics 30
  • General Health Professions 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 74
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 35
Replace S. Levy with:
S. Levy United Kingdom
Élisabeth Martin France
Juliette Rennes France
E. H. BRADFORD United States
Xiaoyu Zhou China
Chris Burgess United Kingdom
Roger Hadley United Kingdom
B. Williams United States
Anna M. Morenz United States
Michael Eve Italy
Stefanie Graefe relative to S. Levy United Kingdom S. Levy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
S. Levy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stefanie Graefe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefanie Graefe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefanie Graefe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefanie Graefe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefanie Graefe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefanie Graefe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefanie Graefe. The network helps show where Stefanie Graefe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Stefanie Graefe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stefanie Graefe Line = papers co-authored together Stefanie Graefe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200545
2 201129
3 201720
4 201919
5 202017
6 201911
7 20169
8 20199
9 20128
10 20128
11 20115
12 20214
13 20073
14 20153
15 20152
16 20071
17 20251
18 20181
19 20121
20 20171

About Stefanie Graefe

Stefanie Graefe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation, Technology, and Society (4 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Economic and Social Issues (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations), Biophysics (30 citations), General Health Professions (47 citations), Sociology and Political Science (74 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (35 citations). Stefanie Graefe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Silke van Dyk, Stephan Lessenich, Emma Dowling, Markus Kitzler, George R. Welch, G. G. Paulus, A.A. Kolomenskii, Nikolai G. Kalugin, Dmitry Pestov and Yuri V. Rostovtsev. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Der Unfallchirurg, Leviathan, Berliner Journal für Soziologie and Soziale Welt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact