Stef Aupers

2.3k citations
51 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Health top 2%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Social Media and Politics

Papers in

Stef Aupers

42 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stef Aupers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health 293
  • Communication 187
  • Sociology and Political Science 853
  • Philosophy 210
  • Geography, Planning and Development 61
Replace Sean P. Hier with:
Sean P. Hier Canada
Nicholas Hookway Australia
C. Thi Nguyen United States
Piotr S. Bobkowski United States
Carles Feixa Spain
Paul Hodkinson United Kingdom
Matteo Vergani Australia
Sophia Moskalenko United States
Laura Huey Canada
Andrew S. Rancer United States
Stef Aupers relative to Sean P. Hier Canada Sean P. Hier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Sean P. Hier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stef Aupers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stef Aupers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stef Aupers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stef Aupers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stef Aupers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stef Aupers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stef Aupers. The network helps show where Stef Aupers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stef Aupers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stef Aupers Line = papers co-authored together Stef Aupers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007210
2 2014172
3 2012137
4 2006113
5 201681
6 200944
7 201132
8 200927
9 201427
10 201526
11
Paradoxes of Individualization: Social Control and Social Conflict in Contemporary Modernity
201125
12 201223
13 201923
14 201518
15 202317
16 200215
17 201613
18 201913
19 201211
20 202310

About Stef Aupers

Stef Aupers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Health, Communication and Education, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (10 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (9 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (5 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (293 citations), Communication (187 citations), Sociology and Political Science (853 citations), Philosophy (210 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (61 citations). Stef Aupers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dick Houtman, Jaron Harambam, Lars De Wildt, Willem de Koster, Peter Achterberg, Jeroen van der Waal, Julian Schaap, Paul Heelas, Peter Mascini and Johan Heilbron. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cultural Studies, Information Communication & Society, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Social Compass and New Media & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact