Stanley Sheft

67 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stanley Sheft
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Speech and Hearing 471
  • Sensory Systems 298
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Signal Processing 317
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 153
Replace Aleksander Sęk with:
Aleksander Sęk Poland
So ren Buus United States
Joshua G. W. Bernstein United States
David A. Eddins United States
Bernhard U. Seeber Germany
Adrianus J. M. Houtsma United States
Heather A. Kreft United States
Bernhard Laback Austria
Robert H. Gilkey United States
Niek J. Versfeld Netherlands
Stanley Sheft relative to Aleksander Sęk Poland Aleksander Sęk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Aleksander Sęk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stanley Sheft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley Sheft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley Sheft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley Sheft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley Sheft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley Sheft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley Sheft. The network helps show where Stanley Sheft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stanley Sheft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stanley Sheft Line = papers co-authored together Stanley Sheft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996137
2 1989109
3 1989107
4 199684
5 199077
6 200854
7 201245
8 199640
9 201739
10 199835
11 201527
12 201525
13 201024
14 199424
15 201120
16 202019
17 201618
18 199018
19 201216
20 201815

About Stanley Sheft

Stanley Sheft is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing, Civil and Structural Engineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (57 papers), Noise Effects and Management (25 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (22 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (13 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (471 citations), Sensory Systems (298 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Signal Processing (317 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (153 citations). Stanley Sheft has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William A. Yost, Valeriy Shafiro, Roy D. Patterson, Christian Lorenzi, Raymond H. Dye, William P. Shofner, Brian Gygi, Sandra J. Guzman, Caitlin C. Farrell and Zhiqiang Guo. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, PLoS ONE and Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact