Stacey King
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Oceanography top 10%
- Marine and coastal plant biology
Papers in
-
- Marine and coastal ecosystems 2
- Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses 1
-
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas Jack (1 shared paper)Anwesha Nag (1 shared paper)Graham B. Jones (4 shared papers)Mark A. J. Curran (1 shared paper)Andrew Broadbent (1 shared paper)R. W. Jones (1 shared paper)David A. Rivas (1 shared paper)Michael B. Chancellor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Remediation Journal (1 paper)Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (1 paper)Environmental Chemistry (1 paper)Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)Journal of Environmental Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stacey King
9 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Plant Science 349
- Oceanography 66
- Molecular Biology 295
- Urology 27
- Process Chemistry and Technology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Stacey King
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey King. The network helps show where Stacey King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 367 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Stacey King
Stacey King is a scholar working on Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (2 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (2 papers), Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper), Water Treatment and Disinfection (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper) and Extraction and Separation Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (349 citations), Oceanography (66 citations), Molecular Biology (295 citations), Urology (27 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (10 citations). Stacey King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Jack, Anwesha Nag, Graham B. Jones, Mark A. J. Curran, Andrew Broadbent, R. W. Jones, David A. Rivas, Michael B. Chancellor, Stephen Karasick and José Moreno. Their work appears in journals such as Remediation Journal, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Environmental Chemistry, Schizophrenia Research and Journal of Environmental Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.