Stacey E. McElroy

19 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Stacey E. McElroy
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Health 108
  • Social Psychology 271
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
Replace Nevin Solak with:
Nevin Solak Türkiye
Robert D. Carlisle United States
William James Hoverd New Zealand
Collin D. Barnes United States
Elif Çelebi Türkiye
Megan C. Haggard United States
Craig W. Blatz Canada
Deborah M. Ko United States
Gillean McCluskey United Kingdom
Nickolay Dvorianchikov Russia
Stacey E. McElroy relative to Nevin Solak Türkiye Nevin Solak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
Nevin Solak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey E. McElroy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey E. McElroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey E. McElroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey E. McElroy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey E. McElroy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey E. McElroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey E. McElroy. The network helps show where Stacey E. McElroy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stacey E. McElroy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey E. McElroy Line = papers co-authored together Stacey E. McElroy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2014130
2 201585
3 201932
4 201428
5 201625
6 201722
7 201521
8 201819
9 201519
10 201316
11 201714
12 201912
13 20197
14 20156
15 20143
16 20153
17 20163
18 20192
19 20221

About Stacey E. McElroy

Stacey E. McElroy is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Demography, having authored 19 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (108 citations), Social Psychology (271 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (166 citations). Stacey E. McElroy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Joshua N. Hook, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren, Kenneth G. Rice, Elise Ji Young Choe, Everett L. Worthington, Peter C. Hill, Cirleen DeBlaere, Antoinette M. Landor and Tera R. Hurt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychology and Theology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, The Journal of Positive Psychology, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion and Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact