S⊘ren Asmussen

484 citations
10 papers · 352 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

S⊘ren Asmussen

10 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

S⊘ren Asmussen
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Management Science and Operations Research 256
  • Demography 159
  • Finance 126
  • Management Information Systems 90
  • Statistics and Probability 66
Replace Eric Willekens with:
Eric Willekens Belgium
Harri Nyrhinen Finland
Jevgeņijs Ivanovs Switzerland
Hansjörg Furrer Switzerland
François Dufresne Switzerland
Zbigniew Michna Poland
Stefan Thonhauser Austria
J. Haezendonck Belgium
Pavel V. Gapeev United Kingdom
Jae‐Kyung Woo Australia
S⊘ren Asmussen relative to Eric Willekens Belgium Eric Willekens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eric Willekens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S⊘ren Asmussen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S⊘ren Asmussen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S⊘ren Asmussen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S⊘ren Asmussen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S⊘ren Asmussen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S⊘ren Asmussen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S⊘ren Asmussen. The network helps show where S⊘ren Asmussen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside S⊘ren Asmussen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S⊘ren Asmussen Line = papers co-authored together S⊘ren Asmussen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2000181
2 198566
3 197632
4 198122
5 199414
6 199813
7 19898
8 19887
9 19945
10 19934

About S⊘ren Asmussen

S⊘ren Asmussen is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Mathematical Physics and Transportation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (6 papers), Probability and Risk Models (4 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (3 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (2 papers), Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (2 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (2 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (2 papers) and Point processes and geometric inequalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (256 citations), Demography (159 citations), Finance (126 citations), Management Information Systems (90 citations) and Statistics and Probability (66 citations). S⊘ren Asmussen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Taksar, H. Hering, Colm Art O’Cinneide, Mogens Bladt, Hermann Þórisson, Benjamin Melamed and Reuven Y. Rubinstein. Their work appears in journals such as Probability Theory and Related Fields, Finance and Stochastics, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Queueing Systems and Acta Applicandae Mathematicae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact