Spee Kosloff

1.2k citations
33 papers · 928 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Spee Kosloff

32 papers receiving 877 citations

Peers

Spee Kosloff
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Applied Psychology 151
  • Social Psychology 645
  • Health 124
  • Clinical Psychology 299
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
Replace Stephanie J. Tobin with:
Stephanie J. Tobin Australia
Philip J. Cozzolino United Kingdom
Helen C. Boucher United States
Margaret A. Marshall United States
Kate J. Diebels United States
Samantha Joel Canada
Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno United States
Yu Niiya Japan
Etsuko Hoshino‐Browne United States
Yu Kou China
Spee Kosloff relative to Stephanie J. Tobin Australia Stephanie J. Tobin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Stephanie J. Tobin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Spee Kosloff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Spee Kosloff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spee Kosloff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spee Kosloff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Spee Kosloff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Spee Kosloff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Spee Kosloff. The network helps show where Spee Kosloff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Spee Kosloff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Spee Kosloff Line = papers co-authored together Spee Kosloff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013146
2 2008101
3 200887
4 200966
5 200764
6 200954
7 201447
8 200945
9 201936
10 200836
11 201034
12 201033
13 200630
14 201025
15 201924
16 201022
17 200611
18 201711
19 201310
20 20169

About Spee Kosloff

Spee Kosloff is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (24 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (15 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers) and Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (151 citations), Social Psychology (645 citations), Health (124 citations), Clinical Psychology (299 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations). Spee Kosloff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeff Greenberg, Mark J. Landau, Brian L. Burke, Sheldon Solomon, David Weise, Andy Martens, Tom Pyszczynski, Toni Schmader, Florette Cohen and Daniel Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Self and Identity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and The International Journal of Aging and Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact