Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes

37 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health 28
  • Clinical Psychology 67
  • Transportation 22
  • Otorhinolaryngology 11
  • Social Psychology 39
Replace Bridget V. MacDonald with:
Bridget V. MacDonald United States
Henry Cutler Australia
Patricia Macía Spain
Daniela Benzano Brazil
Zhimin Yan China
Marco Passavanti Italy
Jonathan Groot Denmark
Rob Motl United States
Yana Ma China
Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes relative to Bridget V. MacDonald United States Bridget V. MacDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Bridget V. MacDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes. The network helps show where Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes Line = papers co-authored together Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201848
2 202124
3 201818
4 202215
5 202015
6 202114
7 201611
8 202011
9 202110
10 20199
11 20158
12
Statistical analysis of particle distributions in composite materials.
20008
13 20157
14 20187
15 20217
16 20207
17 20217
18 20226
19 20186
20 20176

About Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes

Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Surgery, General Health Professions, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (2 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (2 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (28 citations), Clinical Psychology (67 citations), Transportation (22 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (11 citations) and Social Psychology (39 citations). Sofia Azeredo‐Lopes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Nigeria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Graça Cardoso, Ana Antunes, Manuela Silva, José Miguel Caldas‐de‐Almeida, Diana Frasquilho, Benedetto Saraceno, Elisabete Arsénio, Henrique Carvalho, Jorge Spratley and Ana Luísa Papoila. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Rhinology Journal, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, European Psychiatry and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact