Sindhu Row
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
-
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 7
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 3
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 6
- Co-authors
- Stelios T. Andreadis (10 shared papers)Daniel D. Swartz (7 shared papers)Carmon Koenigsknecht (3 shared papers)Randall J. Smith (2 shared papers)Yayu Liu (2 shared papers)Sandeep K. Agarwal (1 shared paper)Stella Alimperti (1 shared paper)Ana Santandreu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biomaterials (2 papers)Cells Tissues Organs (1 paper)Journal of Cell Science (1 paper)The FASEB Journal (1 paper)Advanced Functional Materials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Sindhu Row
10 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Biomaterials 220
- Surgery 205
- Genetics 18
- Rehabilitation 11
- Biomedical Engineering 80
Countries citing papers authored by Sindhu Row
This map shows the geographic impact of Sindhu Row's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sindhu Row with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sindhu Row more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sindhu Row
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sindhu Row. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sindhu Row. The network helps show where Sindhu Row may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Sindhu Row, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 9 |
About Sindhu Row
Sindhu Row is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomaterials, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Rehabilitation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (2 papers), Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (220 citations), Surgery (205 citations), Genetics (18 citations), Rehabilitation (11 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (80 citations). Sindhu Row has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stelios T. Andreadis, Daniel D. Swartz, Carmon Koenigsknecht, Randall J. Smith, Yayu Liu, Sandeep K. Agarwal, Stella Alimperti, Ana Santandreu, Pedro Lei and Kwang W. Oh. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Cells Tissues Organs, Journal of Cell Science, The FASEB Journal and Advanced Functional Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.