Simon Eliot

846 citations
24 papers · 136 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Eliot

13 papers receiving 64 citations

Peers

Simon Eliot
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 65
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • History 29
  • Library and Information Sciences 4
  • Museology 8
Replace Jerome Christensen with:
Jerome Christensen United States
François Rigolot United States
Joanne Shattock United Kingdom
William H. Sherman United States
Sean Latham United States
Peter Beal
Laura Lunger Knoppers United States
Ian Haywood United Kingdom
Jason Scott‐Warren United Kingdom
Linda K. Hughes United States
Simon Eliot relative to Jerome Christensen United States Jerome Christensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jerome Christensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Eliot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Eliot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Eliot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Eliot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Eliot. The network helps show where Simon Eliot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Eliot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Eliot Line = papers co-authored together Simon Eliot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Some Patterns And Trends In British Publishing, 1800-1919
199429
2 200021
3 200921
4 200215
5
Literary cultures and the material book
20079
6 20018
7 19858
8
The development of prose
19815
9 20134
10 20034
11 19862
12
The Age of enlightenment
19802
13 20002
14
International perspectives, c.1500-1990
20111
15
Wordsworth and Coleridge
19841
16 20101
17 20061
18 20021
19 20031
20 20130

About Simon Eliot

Simon Eliot is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Library and Information Sciences, History and Communication, having authored 24 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (65 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), History (29 citations), Library and Information Sciences (4 citations) and Museology (8 citations). Simon Eliot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Willison, Andrew Nash, Lyn Pykett, Nancy Armstrong, John Kucich, Kate Flint, Ronald R. Thomas, Deirdre David, Jeff Nunokawa and Patrick Brantlinger. Their work appears in journals such as The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, Publishing Research Quarterly, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Book history and The Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact