Simon Eliot

846 citations
35 papers · 394 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Eliot

19 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers

Simon Eliot
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Library and Information Sciences 94
  • Literature and Literary Theory 163
  • History 122
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
  • Museology 20
Replace Leslie Howsam with:
Leslie Howsam Canada
Jeffrey Knapp United States
Edmund King United Kingdom
Ian Gadd United Kingdom
Henri Jean Martin
David C. Fowler United States
N. R. Ker
Meredith L. McGill United States
David M. Henkin United States
Francis X. Blouin United States
Simon Eliot relative to Leslie Howsam Canada Leslie Howsam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Leslie Howsam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Eliot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Eliot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Eliot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Eliot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Eliot. The network helps show where Simon Eliot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Eliot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Eliot Line = papers co-authored together Simon Eliot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Some Patterns And Trends In British Publishing, 1800-1919
199497
2 200253
3 198540
4 200139
5 200029
6 200625
7 200024
8 200922
9 201317
10
Literary cultures and the material book
20079
11 20087
12
The development of prose
19815
13 20064
14 20034
15 20123
16 20003
17 19862
18 20132
19
The Age of enlightenment
19802
20
International perspectives, c.1500-1990
20111

About Simon Eliot

Simon Eliot is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Library and Information Sciences and History, having authored 35 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (8 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (4 papers), Library Science and Administration (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (94 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (163 citations), History (122 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations) and Museology (20 citations). Simon Eliot has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian Gadd, William Roger Louis, Andrew Nash, Ian Willison, Jeff Nunokawa, Christopher Stray, John Kucich, Deirdre David, Linda M. Shires and Patrick Brantlinger. Their work appears in journals such as The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, Publishing Research Quarterly, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Book history and The Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact