Simon Eliot

662 citations
31 papers · 331 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Eliot

18 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Simon Eliot
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Library and Information Sciences 93
  • Literature and Literary Theory 132
  • History 104
  • History and Philosophy of Science 28
  • Museology 16
Replace Giles Mandelbrote with:
Giles Mandelbrote United Kingdom
Paul Kaufman United States
Folger Shakespeare Library
Edmund G. C. King United Kingdom
Joanne Shattock United Kingdom
Frank Felsenstein United Kingdom
James J. Barnes United Kingdom
Henri Jean Martin
F. J. Levy United States
André Schiffrin
Simon Eliot relative to Giles Mandelbrote United Kingdom Giles Mandelbrote's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Giles Mandelbrote · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Eliot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Eliot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Eliot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Eliot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Eliot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Eliot. The network helps show where Simon Eliot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Simon Eliot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Eliot Line = papers co-authored together Simon Eliot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Some Patterns And Trends In British Publishing, 1800-1919
199494
2 200250
3 198539
4 200137
5 200023
6 200623
7
The history of Oxford University Press
201317
8
Literary cultures and the material book
20079
9 20087
10
The development of prose
19815
11 20034
12 20064
13 20003
14 20123
15 19862
16
The Age of enlightenment
19802
17 20132
18
Wordsworth and Coleridge
19841
19 20101
20 20051

About Simon Eliot

Simon Eliot is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Library and Information Sciences, History and Classics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (7 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Art History and Market Analysis (1 paper) and American Literature and Humor Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (93 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (132 citations), History (104 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations) and Museology (16 citations). Simon Eliot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William Roger Louis, Andrew Nash, Ian Willison, Christopher Stray, W. R. Owens, Jonathan Rose and Maureen Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Nineteenth-Century Literature, Publishing Research Quarterly, The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, Book history and The Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact