Jeffrey Knapp

671 citations
33 papers · 191 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey Knapp

25 papers receiving 113 citations

Peers

Jeffrey Knapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Library and Information Sciences 39
  • Literature and Literary Theory 45
  • Classics 11
  • Anthropology 25
  • Conservation 8
Replace Linda Reed with:
Linda Reed
Edmund King United Kingdom
Lawrence Manley United States
William Baer United States
Fackson Banda South Africa
Christine Pawley United States
Chris Christie United Kingdom
Tom Cheesman United Kingdom
Robert B. Downs United States
Isobel Grundy Canada
Jeffrey Knapp relative to Linda Reed Linda Reed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Linda Reed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Knapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Knapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Knapp. The network helps show where Jeffrey Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey Knapp Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey Knapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199355
2 201420
3 201220
4 200514
5 20228
6 20067
7 20127
8
Engaged Scholarship and Embedded Librarianship
20156
9 20196
10 20135
11 20035
12 20194
13 20234
14 19884
15 19933
16 20093
17 20223
18 20133
19 20192
20 19942

About Jeffrey Knapp

Jeffrey Knapp is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (6 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (45 citations), Classics (11 citations), Anthropology (25 citations) and Conservation (8 citations). Jeffrey Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Arthur B. Ferguson, Nicholas J. Rowland, Eric P. Charles, Loanne Snavely, Abdus Sattar, Ruiyang Yu, Chris W. Lehman and Joseph L. Templeton. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, The Information Society, IFLA Journal, The American Historical Review and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact