Simon Bowles

17 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Simon Bowles
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 297
  • Nephrology 63
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 59
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 89
  • Physiology 87
Replace Markus Köstenberger with:
Markus Köstenberger Austria
Mario Scherkl Austria
Oliver Malle Austria
Zhuxuan Fu United States
Helen Lambert United Kingdom
Rachael M. Biancuzzo United States
Ana Paula Barbosa Portugal
Paweł Abramowicz Poland
Alberto A. Perez United States
Polyxeni Koutkia United States
Simon Bowles relative to Markus Köstenberger Austria Markus Köstenberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39×
Markus Köstenberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Bowles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Bowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Bowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Bowles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Bowles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Bowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Bowles. The network helps show where Simon Bowles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Bowles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Bowles Line = papers co-authored together Simon Bowles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1994199
2 2017198
3 2016119
4 201877
5 202350
6 202117
7 20219
8 20234
9 20253
10 20233
11 20251
12 20241
13 19961
14 20251
15 20231
16 20241
17 19951

About Simon Bowles

Simon Bowles is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Food Science, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (6 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper) and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (297 citations), Nephrology (63 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (59 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (89 citations) and Physiology (87 citations). Simon Bowles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Schlichtig, Amy Evans, Jennifer Walsh, Richard Eastell, Inez Schoenmakers, K.E. Naylor, Kerry S. Jones, Richard Jacques, Anthony Lynn and Jenny R. Paxman. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Journal of Natural Products, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Osteoporosis International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact