Shubham Chamadia

21 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Shubham Chamadia
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Computational Mathematics 16
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 80
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 58
  • Developmental Neuroscience 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 78
Replace Stefanos Georgiadis with:
Stefanos Georgiadis Finland
MohammadMehdi Kafashan United States
Gudrun Stockmanns Germany
M. Huzmezan Canada
Wala Saadeh Pakistan
Siddharth Biswal United States
H. H. Ros Netherlands
Rain Ferenets Estonia
Reza Shalbaf Iran
W. Hetzel Switzerland
Shubham Chamadia relative to Stefanos Georgiadis Finland Stefanos Georgiadis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stefanos Georgiadis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shubham Chamadia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shubham Chamadia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shubham Chamadia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shubham Chamadia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shubham Chamadia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shubham Chamadia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shubham Chamadia. The network helps show where Shubham Chamadia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shubham Chamadia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shubham Chamadia Line = papers co-authored together Shubham Chamadia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201791
2 201936
3 202029
4 202127
5 202020
6 202018
7 202113
8 201611
9 20229
10 20208
11 20187
12 20205
13
Optimal sparse L1-norm principal-component analysis.
20174
14 20173
15 20212
16 20142
17 20192
18 20192
19
Outlier Processing Via L1-Principal Subspaces.
20171
20 20211

About Shubham Chamadia

Shubham Chamadia is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (16 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (80 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (58 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations). Shubham Chamadia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Dimitris A. Pados, Sandipan Kundu, Panos P. Markopoulos, Oluwaseun Akeju, Juan C. Pedemonte, Reine Ibala, Sarah Nguyen, Lauren E. Hobbs, Emery N. Brown and Jason Zhensheng Qu. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Clinical Neurophysiology, PLoS Computational Biology, Journal of Sleep Research and Communications Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact