Shubham Chamadia

23 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Shubham Chamadia
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Computational Mathematics 16
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 54
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 42
  • Developmental Neuroscience 19
  • Signal Processing 44
Replace MohammadMehdi Kafashan with:
MohammadMehdi Kafashan United States
Seul-Ki Yeom South Korea
Gudrun Stockmanns Germany
Siddharth Biswal United States
Chao-Fa Chuang United States
Heonsoo Lee South Korea
Kanta Kido Japan
Yuzhe Zhang China
Robert E. Morley United States
Taikang Ning United States
Shubham Chamadia relative to MohammadMehdi Kafashan United States MohammadMehdi Kafashan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
MohammadMehdi Kafashan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shubham Chamadia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shubham Chamadia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shubham Chamadia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shubham Chamadia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shubham Chamadia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shubham Chamadia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shubham Chamadia. The network helps show where Shubham Chamadia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shubham Chamadia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shubham Chamadia Line = papers co-authored together Shubham Chamadia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201794
2 201938
3 202032
4 202129
5 202022
6 202019
7 202117
8 202212
9 201612
10 20209
11 20187
12 20206
13
Optimal sparse L1-norm principal-component analysis.
20175
14 20175
15 20174
16 20213
17
Outlier Processing Via L1-Principal Subspaces.
20172
18 20142
19 20192
20 20192

About Shubham Chamadia

Shubham Chamadia is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 23 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (16 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (54 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (42 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (19 citations) and Signal Processing (44 citations). Shubham Chamadia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dimitris A. Pados, Sandipan Kundu, Panos P. Markopoulos, Oluwaseun Akeju, Juan C. Pedemonte, Jacob Gitlin, Eunice Hahm, Reine Ibala, Emery N. Brown and Sarah Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of Sleep Research, Clinical Neurophysiology, PLoS Computational Biology and Journal of Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact