Peter Santer

1.9k citations
42 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Santer

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Santer
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 156
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 137
  • Physiology 335
  • Developmental Neuroscience 47
  • Clinical Biochemistry 46
Replace Marina L. H. Honing with:
Marina L. H. Honing Netherlands
Kwok Fu Jacobus Ng Hong Kong
Mioara D. Manole United States
Sheila Alexander United States
Yasuhide Iwao Japan
Sung Mee Jung South Korea
L. B. Santamaria Italy
M. Gellai United States
Guoquan Xu United States
Ivan Žaja Croatia
Peter Santer relative to Marina L. H. Honing Netherlands Marina L. H. Honing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Marina L. H. Honing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Santer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Santer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Santer. The network helps show where Peter Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Santer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Santer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Santer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017316
2 201499
3 202195
4 202265
5 202144
6 202041
7 201938
8 202030
9 201727
10 201426
11 202126
12 202125
13 202025
14 202024
15 202022
16 202222
17 202321
18 202020
19 202020
20 201519

About Peter Santer

Peter Santer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (156 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (137 citations), Physiology (335 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (47 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (46 citations). Peter Santer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Eikermann, Luca J. Wachtendorf, Maximilian S. Schaefer, Pete J. Cox, Matthew Stirling, Brianna J. Stubbs, Rhys Evans, Kieran Clarke, Jack J. Miller and Olivia K. Faull. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact