Shozo Baba
Impact in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Oncology top 5%
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Shohachi Suzuki (10 shared papers)Satoshi Nakamura (8 shared papers)Satoshi Nakamura (7 shared papers)Yusuke Nakamura (2 shared papers)Tatsuo Tanaka (11 shared papers)Akira Horii (1 shared paper)T Aoki (1 shared paper)Hiroki Nagase (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgery Today (10 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (3 papers)World Journal of Surgery (3 papers)International Journal of Cancer (3 papers)Cancer (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Shozo Baba
65 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 700
- Oncology 748
- Cancer Research 321
- Hepatology 132
- Gastroenterology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Shozo Baba
This map shows the geographic impact of Shozo Baba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shozo Baba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shozo Baba more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shozo Baba
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shozo Baba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shozo Baba. The network helps show where Shozo Baba may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shozo Baba, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Correlation between the location of germ-line mutations in the APC gene and the number of colorectal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. | 1992 | 261 |
| 2 | 1999 | 93 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 91 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 72 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 67 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 59 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 51 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 44 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 43 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 39 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 29 | |
| 19 | 1971 | 28 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 26 |
About Shozo Baba
Shozo Baba is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (16 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (13 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (700 citations), Oncology (748 citations), Cancer Research (321 citations), Hepatology (132 citations) and Gastroenterology (61 citations). Shozo Baba has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shohachi Suzuki, Satoshi Nakamura, Satoshi Nakamura, Yusuke Nakamura, Tatsuo Tanaka, Akira Horii, T Aoki, Hiroki Nagase, Michio Ogawa and Takehiko Sasazuki. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery Today, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, World Journal of Surgery, International Journal of Cancer and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.