Shih‐Fen Chen

660 citations
30 papers · 440 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Shih‐Fen Chen

29 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Shih‐Fen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
  • Pharmacology 32
  • Clinical Psychology 68
Replace Tomiko Oskotsky with:
Tomiko Oskotsky United States
Simon A. Hill United Kingdom
Wenjiao Min China
Adrian E. Desai Boström Sweden
Jacob Peedicayil India
Günter Stock Germany
Sami A. Algaidi Saudi Arabia
Qian Su China
Shih‐Fen Chen relative to Tomiko Oskotsky United States Tomiko Oskotsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Tomiko Oskotsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shih‐Fen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shih‐Fen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shih‐Fen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shih‐Fen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shih‐Fen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shih‐Fen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shih‐Fen Chen. The network helps show where Shih‐Fen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shih‐Fen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shih‐Fen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Shih‐Fen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201741
2 200941
3 200841
4 200634
5 200230
6 201821
7 201720
8 201018
9 202018
10 200918
11 201413
12 202012
13 201212
14 201812
15 202011
16 201810
17 202010
18 202010
19 202010
20 202010

About Shih‐Fen Chen

Shih‐Fen Chen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Reproductive Medicine and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cryptography and Data Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (85 citations), Reproductive Medicine (30 citations), Pharmacology (32 citations) and Clinical Psychology (68 citations). Shih‐Fen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu‐Chih Shen, Shu Ching Yang, Chia‐Hsiang Chen, Chung Y. Hsu, Yu‐Cih Yang, Jen‐Huai Chiang, Pei‐Yi Chen, Chaucer C. H. Lin, Paul W. Beamish and Shaw-Ji Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Death Studies, Journal of Affective Disorders, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact