Shaoping Li
Impact in
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 0.02%
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 133
- Pharmacology 81
- Fungal Biology and Applications 73
- Co-authors
- Feng-Qing Yang (30 shared papers)Karl Wah Keung Tsim (20 shared papers)Y.T. Wang (21 shared papers)Tina Ting-Xia Dong (17 shared papers)Ding‐Tao Wu (25 shared papers)Kit‐Leong Cheong (22 shared papers)Guang‐Ping Lv (18 shared papers)Dejun Hu (29 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Shaoping Li
296 papers receiving 11k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Complementary and alternative medicine 3k
- Pharmacology 2.7k
- Analytical Chemistry 1.1k
- Food Science 1.8k
- Pharmacology 516
Countries citing papers authored by Shaoping Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Shaoping Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaoping Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaoping Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shaoping Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaoping Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaoping Li. The network helps show where Shaoping Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaoping Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 303 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 262 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 225 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 170 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 156 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 156 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 141 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 135 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 128 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 128 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 122 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 117 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 113 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 109 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 108 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 106 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 102 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 100 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 98 |
About Shaoping Li
Shaoping Li is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Analytical Chemistry, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 303 papers that have together received 11.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (133 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (73 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (28 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (21 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (19 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (14 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (14 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (3k citations), Pharmacology (2.7k citations), Analytical Chemistry (1.1k citations), Food Science (1.8k citations) and Pharmacology (516 citations). Shaoping Li has collaborated with scholars based in Macao, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Feng-Qing Yang, Karl Wah Keung Tsim, Y.T. Wang, Tina Ting-Xia Dong, Ding‐Tao Wu, Kit‐Leong Cheong, Guang‐Ping Lv, Dejun Hu, Qingwen Zhang and Yong Deng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Separation Science, Molecules and Electrophoresis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.