Shaobin Wei

462 citations
34 papers · 300 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Shaobin Wei

30 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Shaobin Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Hepatology 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 51
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 23
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 18
  • Biological Psychiatry 4
Replace Zhuang Li with:
Zhuang Li China
Xinliang Kong China
Peipei Ren China
Francisca Salas‐Pérez Chile
GY Minuk Canada
Tongmin Xue China
Laura Park United States
Justina Ucheojor Onwuka China
Shaogang Huang China
Behnaz Khani Iran
Shaobin Wei relative to Zhuang Li China Zhuang Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Zhuang Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaobin Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaobin Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaobin Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaobin Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaobin Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaobin Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaobin Wei. The network helps show where Shaobin Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaobin Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shaobin Wei Line = papers co-authored together Shaobin Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201377
2 202229
3 201722
4 202121
5 201813
6 201913
7 202411
8 201511
9 20249
10 20239
11 20179
12 20249
13 20139
14 20216
15 20206
16 20186
17 20205
18 20175
19 20194
20 20194

About Shaobin Wei

Shaobin Wei is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (62 citations), Reproductive Medicine (51 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (23 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (18 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (4 citations). Shaobin Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J.N. Vauthey, Junichi Shindoh, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Steven A. Curley, Sanjay Gupta, Michael B. Wallace, Thomas A. Aloia, Jian Zhou, Xiaowei Xu and Buxing Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, Medicine, HPB, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact