Sen Li
Impact in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Papers in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 12
-
- Curcumin's Biomedical Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Yongbiao Cheng (7 shared papers)Hongliang Jiang (13 shared papers)Chengwu Song (13 shared papers)Shuna Jin (12 shared papers)Hanqing Zeng (5 shared papers)Zhaohui Zhu (5 shared papers)Youpeng Zhang (3 shared papers)Yong Tang (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Food & Function (2 papers)Food Chemistry (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis (1 paper)Ecography (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Sen Li
46 papers receiving 849 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Complementary and alternative medicine 145
- Psychiatry and Mental health 165
- Molecular Medicine 34
- Health Informatics 9
- Molecular Biology 181
Countries citing papers authored by Sen Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Sen Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sen Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sen Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sen Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sen Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sen Li. The network helps show where Sen Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sen Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 157 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 17 |
About Sen Li
Sen Li is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 869 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (12 papers), Natural Products and Biological Research (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers) and Male Reproductive Health Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (145 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations), Molecular Medicine (34 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations) and Molecular Biology (181 citations). Sen Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Yongbiao Cheng, Hongliang Jiang, Chengwu Song, Shuna Jin, Hanqing Zeng, Zhaohui Zhu, Youpeng Zhang, Yong Tang, Zhifeng Du and Jin Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Food & Function, Food Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Ecography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.