Scott Yates

1.0k citations
32 papers · 688 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Yates

30 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Scott Yates
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Safety Research 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 408
  • General Health Professions 178
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • Demography 76
Replace Geoffrey Mercer with:
Geoffrey Mercer United Kingdom
Jennie Bristow United Kingdom
Alan France New Zealand
Wolfgang Schröer Germany
Kathy Boxall United Kingdom
Bren Neale United Kingdom
Lennart Nygren Sweden
Nicola Taylor New Zealand
Gerison Lansdown Canada
Nancy Worth Canada
Scott Yates relative to Geoffrey Mercer United Kingdom Geoffrey Mercer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Geoffrey Mercer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Yates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Yates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Yates. The network helps show where Scott Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Yates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Yates Line = papers co-authored together Scott Yates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006248
2 2010103
3 202066
4 201634
5 201231
6 201028
7 200825
8 201523
9 201622
10
Truth, power, and ethics in care services for people with learning difficulties
200517
11 201015
12 202013
13 20159
14 20238
15 20218
16 20236
17 20225
18 20095
19 20174
20 20223

About Scott Yates

Scott Yates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 32 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (9 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (6 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (94 citations), Sociology and Political Science (408 citations), General Health Professions (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations) and Demography (76 citations). Scott Yates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Payne, Jeremy Staff, Ricardo Sabatés, Angel L. Harris, Simon Dyson, Alan Roulstone, Bolanle Ola, Kim Foster, Rochelle Hine and Brenda Gladstone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Youth Studies, Disability & Society, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Journal of Social Policy and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact