Scott Wallace

57 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Scott Wallace
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Computer Science Applications 209
  • Software 130
  • Hardware and Architecture 105
  • Information Systems 257
  • Human-Computer Interaction 58
Replace J. William Atwood with:
J. William Atwood Canada
Peter Van Roy Belgium
Chris McDonald Australia
Rudolf Fleischer Germany
Bruce W. Weide United States
David Carrington Australia
Martin C. Carlisle United States
Alex Quilici United States
Steffen Zschaler United Kingdom
Daniel J. Dubois United States
Scott Wallace relative to J. William Atwood Canada J. William Atwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
J. William Atwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Wallace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Wallace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Wallace. The network helps show where Scott Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Wallace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Wallace Line = papers co-authored together Scott Wallace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997281
2 1988103
3 201650
4 199748
5 201529
6 201027
7 198826
8 201426
9 200824
10 201623
11 201023
12 201619
13 200617
14 200814
15 202213
16 201411
17 200811
18 201710
19
A Test Bed for Developing Intelligent Synthetic Characters
200210
20 20179

About Scott Wallace

Scott Wallace is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (11 papers), Power System Optimization and Stability (7 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (6 papers), Islanding Detection in Power Systems (5 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (5 papers) and Smart Grid Security and Resilience (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (209 citations), Software (130 citations), Hardware and Architecture (105 citations), Information Systems (257 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations). Scott Wallace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Dan Ingalls, Alan Kay, John Maloney, Ted Kaehler, Xiaodong Liang, Xinghui Zhao, David Chiu, Ingrid Russell, Andrew Nierman and Robert McCartney. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Computer Science Education and Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact