Scott Stanfield

743 citations
37 papers · 624 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Stanfield

37 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Scott Stanfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Applied Mathematics 226
  • Computational Mechanics 431
  • Aerospace Engineering 320
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 88
  • Bioengineering 19
Replace Alec Houpt with:
Alec Houpt United States
Mario Carbonaro Belgium
B. Z. Cybyk United States
E. Felderman United States
В. А. Лашков Russia
P. Magre France
Eric Matlis United States
P. K. Tretyakov Russia
Kenichi Takita Japan
В. И. Копченов Russia
Scott Stanfield relative to Alec Houpt United States Alec Houpt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Alec Houpt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Stanfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Stanfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Stanfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Stanfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Stanfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Stanfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Stanfield. The network helps show where Scott Stanfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Stanfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Stanfield Line = papers co-authored together Scott Stanfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 201459
3 201254
4 200947
5 201242
6 201534
7 201334
8 201131
9 200626
10 201219
11 201818
12 201918
13 201117
14 200616
15 201215
16 201715
17 201210
18 20069
19 20179
20 20198

About Scott Stanfield

Scott Stanfield is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (16 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (15 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (12 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (10 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (10 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (4 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (226 citations), Computational Mechanics (431 citations), Aerospace Engineering (320 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (88 citations) and Bioengineering (19 citations). Scott Stanfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Roger L. Kimmel, Matthew P. Borg, David Adamczak, James Menart, Jonathan Poggie, James Hayes, Nicholas J. Bisek, C.A. DeJoseph, Jim Crafton and Thomas J. Juliano. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Applied Physics Letters and Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact