Progress in Aerospace Sciences

81.0k citations
893 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
    • Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
    • Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
    • Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
    • Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
    • Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms

Papers in

    • Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows 108
    • Rocket and propulsion systems research 67
    • Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics 67
    • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows 266
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics 254

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

864 papers receiving 76.8k citations

Peers

Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Computational Mechanics 39.4k
  • Aerospace Engineering 45.4k
  • Environmental Engineering 7.7k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 3.8k
  • Applied Mathematics 4.2k
Replace Applied Mechanics Reviews with:
Applied Mechanics Reviews United States
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics United States
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science United States
Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics United States
Journal of Turbulence United States
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering India
Combustion Theory and Modelling United States
International journal of computational fluid dynamics United States
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics China
Journal of Ship Research United States
Progress in Aerospace Sciences relative to Applied Mechanics Reviews United States Applied Mechanics Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Applied Mechanics Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Aerospace Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

About Progress in Aerospace Sciences

The 893 papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 81.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences usually cover Aerospace Engineering (539 papers), Computational Mechanics (438 papers), Applied Mathematics (100 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (41 papers) and Environmental Engineering (65 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (266 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (254 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (108 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (100 papers), Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies (81 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (67 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (67 papers) and Wind and Air Flow Studies (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Aerospace Sciences are Wei Shyy, Constantinos Soutis, Alexander I. J. Forrester, Andy J. Keane, Ugo Piomelli, John C. Lin, Jean Délery, A. Michalke, Abdessattar Abdelkefi and Mostafa Hassanalian.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact