James Menart

657 citations
48 papers · 530 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Menart

47 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

James Menart
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Aerospace Engineering 353
  • Applied Mathematics 133
  • Computational Mechanics 206
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 97
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 257
Replace В. И. Копченов with:
В. И. Копченов Russia
James Hayes United States
Alec Houpt United States
В. А. Лашков Russia
В.М. Шибков Russia
Eric Matlis United States
I. A. Moralev Russia
Takayasu Fujino Japan
B. Z. Cybyk United States
С. А. Васильевский Russia
James Menart relative to В. И. Копченов Russia В. И. Копченов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
В. И. Копченов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Menart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Menart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Menart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Menart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Menart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Menart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Menart. The network helps show where James Menart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James Menart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Menart Line = papers co-authored together James Menart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200453
2 200947
3 201033
4 200729
5 199826
6 200626
7 200623
8 200522
9 200216
10 200816
11 200415
12 200714
13 200613
14 200612
15 201012
16 200612
17 201111
18 20169
19 20069
20 19989

About James Menart

James Menart is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (24 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (23 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (13 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (10 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (10 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers) and Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (353 citations), Applied Mathematics (133 citations), Computational Mechanics (206 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (97 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (257 citations). James Menart has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Roger L. Kimmel, Joseph Shang, James Hayes, Scott Stanfield, Lanchao Lin, C.A. DeJoseph, Michael Patterson, Peter Stoltz, John Loverich and Hong Huang. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets and Energies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact