Scott Richards

15 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Scott Richards
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Sensory Systems 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Occupational Therapy 16
  • Speech and Hearing 20
Replace Meredith C B Adams with:
Meredith C B Adams United States
Élodie Ramos United States
Gholamreza Pouryaghoub Iran
Jacquelien Dros Netherlands
Katrin Probyn United Kingdom
Mazlina Mazlan Malaysia
Rosie Essery United Kingdom
Yasemin Parlak Demir Türkiye
Antônio Henrique Germano-Soares Brazil
Jóhanna Eyrún Sverrisdottir United States
Scott Richards relative to Meredith C B Adams United States Meredith C B Adams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Meredith C B Adams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Richards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Richards more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Richards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Richards. The network helps show where Scott Richards may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Richards, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Richards Line = papers co-authored together Scott Richards links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200067
2 201244
3
Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise.
199941
4 200440
5 202226
6 202121
7 20189
8 20149
9 20048
10 20237
11 20037
12 20056
13 20075
14 20074
15
Reliability of physical examination in patients with chronic pain.
19841
16 20090
17 20150

About Scott Richards

Scott Richards is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 17 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Color perception and design (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Noise Effects and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (38 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations), Occupational Therapy (16 citations) and Speech and Hearing (20 citations). Scott Richards has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Shewchuk, Deepak Prasher, Yu Chen, Ken B. Waites, Anjali Desai, Margaret M. Schmitt, Elizabeth J. Richardson, Thomas C. Krivak, Dwight E. Heron and Paniti Sukumvanich. Their work appears in journals such as Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Journal of Pain Research, Pain, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact