Scott R. Schell

38 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Scott R. Schell
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cancer Research 341
  • Internal Medicine 53
  • Immunology 324
  • Oncology 319
  • Radiation 96
Replace M J Hershman with:
M J Hershman United Kingdom
U Metzger Switzerland
Erich Stoelben Germany
Seung Ick South Korea
G. Otto Germany
Andrew R L Medford United Kingdom
Maria Rosa Valvano Italy
Geoffrey M. Silver United States
Minoru Kanazawa Japan
C. Chapman United Kingdom
Scott R. Schell relative to M J Hershman United Kingdom M J Hershman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
M J Hershman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott R. Schell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott R. Schell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott R. Schell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott R. Schell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott R. Schell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott R. Schell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott R. Schell. The network helps show where Scott R. Schell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott R. Schell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott R. Schell Line = papers co-authored together Scott R. Schell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989239
2 1990197
3 2007189
4 2002114
5 200792
6 199986
7 200776
8 200275
9 200162
10 200849
11 200244
12 198837
13 200337
14 200237
15 200533
16 198729
17 200428
18 200628
19 200727
20 199927

About Scott R. Schell

Scott R. Schell is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (341 citations), Internal Medicine (53 citations), Immunology (324 citations), Oncology (319 citations) and Radiation (96 citations). Scott R. Schell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank W. Fitch, Thomas F. Gajewski, Gerard J. Nau, Frank A. Vicini, Frank J. Wessels, Edward M. Copeland, Larry L. Kestin, Mark A. Talamini, Robert Udelsman and Inga S. Grills. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Research, The Journal of Immunology, Surgical Infections, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact