Surgical Infections

2.1k papers and 32.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Surgical Infections in the last decades have received a total of 32.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical Infections usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Epidemiology (519 papers) and Infectious Diseases (382 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical site infection prevention (524 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (238 papers) and Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (210 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical Infections are J. Wesley Alexander, Donald E. Fry, Lena M. Napolitano, Robert G. Sawyer, Philip S. Barie, E. Patchen Dellinger, William G. Cheadle, Stephen Rothenburger, Joshua A. Urban and Soumitra R. Eachempati.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical Infections

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical Infections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical Infections.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical Infections

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical Infections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical Infections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical Infections more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025