Scott Oloff

1.4k citations
13 papers · 1.2k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Oloff

12 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Scott Oloff
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 618
  • Neurology 136
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 279
  • Developmental Neuroscience 50
  • Pharmacology 86
Replace Tjerk Bueters with:
Tjerk Bueters Sweden
Philipp O. Tsvetkov France
Katalin Soós Hungary
Thomas Balle Denmark
Hugues‐Olivier Bertrand France
Heike J. Wobst United States
Christophe Rochais France
Shin‐ichiro Nagatsuka Japan
Shivani Ahuja United States
Scott Oloff relative to Tjerk Bueters Sweden Tjerk Bueters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Tjerk Bueters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Oloff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Oloff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Oloff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Oloff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Oloff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Oloff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Oloff. The network helps show where Scott Oloff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Oloff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Oloff Line = papers co-authored together Scott Oloff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002282
2 2006212
3 2006133
4 2006118
5 2006113
6 200581
7 200480
8 200643
9 200536
10 200636
11 200531
12 20073
13 20200

About Scott Oloff

Scott Oloff is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Virology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (11 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (2 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (618 citations), Neurology (136 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (279 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (50 citations) and Pharmacology (86 citations). Scott Oloff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Tropsha, Ken D. McCarthy, Wolfgang Nett, Alexander Golbraikh, Ingo Muegge, Shuxing Zhang, Harold Kohn, Richard B. Mailman, Yun-De Xiao and Lowell H. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Neuropharmacology and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact