Scott Ode

1.8k citations
30 papers · 807 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Ode

30 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

Scott Ode
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Applied Psychology 132
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 340
  • Clinical Psychology 402
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 35
  • Social Psychology 203
Replace Bethany G. Ciesielski with:
Bethany G. Ciesielski United States
Lane Beckes United States
Jonathan Banks United States
Ben Grafton Australia
Bruce Doré United States
Lisa J. Halberstadt United States
Yang Qu United States
Silke Fischer Germany
Eric C. Reheiser United States
Kathrine Shepherd United States
Scott Ode relative to Bethany G. Ciesielski United States Bethany G. Ciesielski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bethany G. Ciesielski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Ode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Ode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Ode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Ode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Ode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Ode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Ode. The network helps show where Scott Ode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Scott Ode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Ode Line = papers co-authored together Scott Ode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009111
2 201082
3 200681
4 200878
5 201175
6 200751
7 200744
8 201036
9 201033
10 201228
11 201028
12 200724
13 201722
14 200920
15 200719
16 201117
17 200911
18 200610
19 20106
20 20115

About Scott Ode

Scott Ode is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (132 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (340 citations), Clinical Psychology (402 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations) and Social Psychology (203 citations). Scott Ode has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Robinson, Sara K. Moeller, Roger Feltman, Adam K. Fetterman, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, Kathryn H. Gordon, P. Goetz, Rebecca J. Compton, Clayton J. Hilmert and Joshua Carp. Their work appears in journals such as Emotion, Journal of Research in Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, Cognition & Emotion and Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact