Scott Monteith

29 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Scott Monteith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Informatics 100
  • Applied Psychology 295
  • Family Practice 20
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
  • Health Information Management 42
Replace Rachel Kornfield with:
Rachel Kornfield United States
Nicole Martinez‐Martin United States
Jiska J Aardoom Netherlands
Lamiece Hassan United Kingdom
Michael H. Bernstein United States
Huong Ly Tong Australia
Pauline Whelan United Kingdom
Sumithra Velupillai Sweden
Yin Leng Theng Singapore
Madison Milne‐Ives United Kingdom
Scott Monteith relative to Rachel Kornfield United States Rachel Kornfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Rachel Kornfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Monteith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Monteith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Monteith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Monteith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Monteith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Monteith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Monteith. The network helps show where Scott Monteith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Scott Monteith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Monteith Line = papers co-authored together Scott Monteith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014103
2 2017100
3 2020100
4 202399
5 201486
6 202167
7 201559
8 201646
9 201639
10 201939
11 202235
12 201733
13 202229
14 201724
15 201922
16 201520
17 201919
18 201317
19 202315
20 202415

About Scott Monteith

Scott Monteith is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (100 citations), Applied Psychology (295 citations), Family Practice (20 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations) and Health Information Management (42 citations). Scott Monteith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tasha Glenn, Michael Bauer, John Geddes, Peter C. Whybrow, Eric D. Achtyes, Rita Bauer, Michael Gitlin, Paul Grof, Martin Alda and Emanuel Severus. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, Current Psychiatry Reports, Pharmacopsychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact