Scott McLean
Impact in
-
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
-
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Papers in
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 5
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 2
- Genetics 10
- Co-authors
- David Hoisington (3 shared papers)Alessandro Pellegrineschi (3 shared papers)Natasha Bohorova (2 shared papers)R. M. Brito (3 shared papers)María Pacheco (2 shared papers)Roger Frutos (1 shared paper)Monique Royer (1 shared paper)Jordan E. Pinsker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Crop Science (3 papers)Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2 papers)Euphytica (2 papers)Plant Cell Reports (1 paper)Molecular Genetics and Metabolism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoGermany
In The Last Decade
Scott McLean
20 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Biotechnology 41
- Plant Science 131
- Genetics 92
- Molecular Biology 196
- Agronomy and Crop Science 15
Countries citing papers authored by Scott McLean
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott McLean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott McLean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott McLean. The network helps show where Scott McLean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott McLean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 14 | The Lowland Tropical Maize Subprogram | 1994 | 4 |
| 15 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | Recurrent selection for inbreeding-stress tolerance in four intermediate-maturity maize populations | 1995 | 2 |
| 19 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 |
About Scott McLean
Scott McLean is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Plant Breeding (5 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (41 citations), Plant Science (131 citations), Genetics (92 citations), Molecular Biology (196 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (15 citations). Scott McLean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Hoisington, Alessandro Pellegrineschi, Natasha Bohorova, R. M. Brito, María Pacheco, Roger Frutos, Monique Royer, Jordan E. Pinsker, Maristela Marques Salgado and William J. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Crop Science, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Euphytica, Plant Cell Reports and Molecular Genetics and Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.