Scott MacKenzie

1.2k citations
24 papers · 377 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Scott MacKenzie

14 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Scott MacKenzie
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Literature and Literary Theory 139
  • Cultural Studies 86
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 34
  • Philosophy 56
  • Economics and Econometrics 78
Replace Garrett Stewart with:
Garrett Stewart United States
Chris Baldick
Samuel Taylor Coleridge United Kingdom
Roger Luckhurst United Kingdom
Isobel Armstrong United Kingdom
Joanna Żylińska United Kingdom
Bill Brown United States
Margaret Atack United Kingdom
Mary Shelley United States
Hal Foster France
Scott MacKenzie relative to Garrett Stewart United States Garrett Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Garrett Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott MacKenzie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott MacKenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott MacKenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott MacKenzie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott MacKenzie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott MacKenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott MacKenzie. The network helps show where Scott MacKenzie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Scott MacKenzie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott MacKenzie Line = papers co-authored together Scott MacKenzie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991240
2 200551
3 199918
4 200512
5
Purity and Provocation: Dogme '95
200310
6 20059
7 20107
8 20195
9
Ann Radcliffe's Gothic Narrative and the Readers at Home
19994
10 20054
11 20164
12 20133
13 20002
14 20052
15 20162
16
Flowers in the Dustbin: Termite Culture and Detritus Cinema
19981
17 20021
18 20061
19 20141
20 20230

About Scott MacKenzie

Scott MacKenzie is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Ecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers) and Historical Turkish Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (139 citations), Cultural Studies (86 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (34 citations), Philosophy (56 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (78 citations). Scott MacKenzie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Noël Carroll, Mette Hjort, R. J. Conover, N. Mumm, Karine Bertrand and Thomas Waugh. Their work appears in journals such as ELH, Studies in the novel, Studies in Romanticism, Canadian Journal of Film Studies and Journal of Scandinavian Cinema.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact