Scott King

16 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Scott King
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Sensory Systems 150
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • Applied Psychology 112
  • Social Psychology 277
Replace Nancy DeCourville with:
Nancy DeCourville Canada
Gudrun Sproesser Germany
Ernestina Etchemendy Spain
Linda Hagen United States
Anne-Laure Gilet France
Richard M. Nicki Canada
Carolijn Ouwehand Netherlands
Shaun Watson Australia
Xiaoyuan Zhang China
Pamara F. Chang United States
Scott King relative to Nancy DeCourville Canada Nancy DeCourville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Nancy DeCourville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott King. The network helps show where Scott King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Scott King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott King Line = papers co-authored together Scott King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2005266
2 2011155
3 201298
4 201365
5 201651
6 201341
7 200535
8 200618
9 20217
10 20176
11 20115
12 20154
13
Development and Validation of the Workplace Intergenerational Atmosphere Scale
20103
14 20163
15 20122
16 20121

About Scott King

Scott King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (150 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (38 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations), Applied Psychology (112 citations) and Social Psychology (277 citations). Scott King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fred B. Bryant, Colette M. Smart, Charles Spence, Carlos Velasco, Anne-Sylvie Crisinel, J C Petrie, Eva Cyhlarova, Adele Krusche, J. Mark G. Williams and Russell Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, BMJ Open, Age and Ageing, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Journal of Happiness Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact