Scott King

19 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers

Scott King
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Sensory Systems 165
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 334
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Social Psychology 316
Replace Nancy DeCourville with:
Nancy DeCourville Canada
Gudrun Sproesser Germany
Ernestina Etchemendy Spain
Isabel Urdapilleta France
Linda Hagen United States
Anne-Laure Gilet France
George Van Doorn Australia
Shaun Watson Australia
Loren McCarter United States
Anna Maria Meneghini Italy
Scott King relative to Nancy DeCourville Canada Nancy DeCourville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Nancy DeCourville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott King. The network helps show where Scott King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott King Line = papers co-authored together Scott King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2005309
2 2011167
3 2012103
4 201371
5 201660
6 201353
7 200535
8 200621
9 200613
10 201313
11 201310
12 20217
13 20176
14 20115
15 20154
16
Development and Validation of the Workplace Intergenerational Atmosphere Scale
20103
17 20163
18 20122
19 20121

About Scott King

Scott King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (165 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (334 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations) and Social Psychology (316 citations). Scott King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fred B. Bryant, Colette M. Smart, Charles Spence, Carlos Velasco, J C Petrie, Anne-Sylvie Crisinel, Adele Krusche, J. Mark G. Williams, Eva Cyhlarova and Russell Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Happiness Studies, Journal of Sensory Studies, Age and Ageing, Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact