Scott Kellogg

2.0k citations
27 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Kellogg

27 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Scott Kellogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Clinical Psychology 507
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Toxicology 55
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 289
  • Epidemiology 527
Replace Stephen P. Weinstein with:
Stephen P. Weinstein United States
S. Kelly Avants United States
Suzette Glasner‐Edwards United States
Frank D. Mulvaney United States
Robert C. Sterling United States
Shawnee Basden United Kingdom
Joan E. Zweben United States
Rachel Gonzales United States
Jeanne L. Obert United States
Peter Blanken Netherlands
Scott Kellogg relative to Stephen P. Weinstein United States Stephen P. Weinstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Stephen P. Weinstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Kellogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Kellogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Kellogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Kellogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Kellogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Kellogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Kellogg. The network helps show where Scott Kellogg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Kellogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Kellogg Line = papers co-authored together Scott Kellogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006257
2 2006223
3 2006130
4 2003129
5 1999126
6 200263
7 200560
8 201250
9 200250
10 199350
11 200648
12 200842
13 200739
14 200436
15 200629
16 200326
17 201218
18 200212
19 201011
20 200511

About Scott Kellogg

Scott Kellogg is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (507 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Toxicology (55 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (289 citations) and Epidemiology (527 citations). Scott Kellogg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey E. Young, Mary Jeanne Kreek, Elisa Triffleman, Kathleen M. Carroll, Maxine L. Stitzer, Ann Ho, Jack Blaine, Jessica M. Peirce, John M. Roll and Marion Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Addictive Diseases, Psychotherapy, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact