Scott J. Thomas

27 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Scott J. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Spectroscopy 124
  • Mechanics of Materials 137
  • Ophthalmology 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
  • Computational Mechanics 84
Replace Paul L. Hartman with:
Paul L. Hartman United States
R. W. Davies United States
Gisela Eckhardt United States
David O. Ham United States
Heinz Fischer Germany
A. M. Prokhorov Russia
Ralph R. Jacobs United States
G. L. Loper United States
H. F. Tiedje Canada
David Wright United States
Scott J. Thomas relative to Paul L. Hartman United States Paul L. Hartman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul L. Hartman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Thomas. The network helps show where Scott J. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Scott J. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott J. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Scott J. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966102
2 198085
3 197465
4 196843
5 198940
6 196636
7 197529
8 199316
9 198412
10 196711
11 199211
12 19867
13 19857
14 19787
15 19666
16 19886
17 19905
18 19794
19
Forward modeling and data acquisition for high-accuracy electromagnetic subsurface imaging
19893
20 19933

About Scott J. Thomas

Scott J. Thomas is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Economics and Econometrics, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (10 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (4 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (3 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (124 citations), Mechanics of Materials (137 citations), Ophthalmology (42 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (139 citations) and Computational Mechanics (84 citations). Scott J. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D.W. Gregg, Ralph R. Jacobs, Irving P. Herman, Jack B. Marling, Bernard Grofman, Robert F. Harrison, Irving J. Bigio, Joseph A. Zuclich, Jon E. Sollid and Claude Phipps. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Public Choice, Health Physics and Development Policy Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact