Scott J. Thomas

30 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Scott J. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Spectroscopy 123
  • Mechanics of Materials 136
  • Ophthalmology 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
  • Computational Mechanics 83
Replace Robert J. Hull with:
Robert J. Hull United States
Paul L. Hartman United States
R. W. Davies United States
R. A. Beyer United States
Gisela Eckhardt United States
Steven G. Hansen United States
A. M. Prokhorov Russia
B. Großwendt Germany
E. J. Sternglass United States
M.P.R. Waligórski Poland
Scott J. Thomas relative to Robert J. Hull United States Robert J. Hull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert J. Hull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Thomas. The network helps show where Scott J. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott J. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott J. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Scott J. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966102
2 198085
3 201175
4 197465
5 196842
6 198940
7 196636
8 197529
9 201725
10 201220
11 199316
12 198412
13 199211
14 196711
15 19787
16 19867
17 19857
18 19666
19 19886
20 19905

About Scott J. Thomas

Scott J. Thomas is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Economics and Econometrics, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (4 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (3 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (123 citations), Mechanics of Materials (136 citations), Ophthalmology (42 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (139 citations) and Computational Mechanics (83 citations). Scott J. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include D.W. Gregg, Harry T. Papaconstantinou, Ralph R. Jacobs, Irving P. Herman, Jack B. Marling, Nicole E. Sharp, Bernard Grofman, Claude Phipps, Joseph A. Zuclich and Irving J. Bigio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Health Physics and Public Choice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact