Scott I. Fields

1.9k citations
65 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Scott I. Fields

65 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Scott I. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 465
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 343
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
  • Surgery 313
  • Emergency Medicine 59
Replace Marco Moschetta with:
Marco Moschetta Italy
Huay‐Ben Pan Taiwan
Yun‐Chung Cheung Taiwan
Paolo Fonio Italy
Roberto Cannella Italy
Dae Chul Jung South Korea
Hong‐Jen Chiou Taiwan
Wael M. Shabana Canada
Kazuto Ashizawa Japan
B.B. Goldberg United States
Scott I. Fields relative to Marco Moschetta Italy Marco Moschetta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marco Moschetta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott I. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott I. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott I. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott I. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott I. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott I. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott I. Fields. The network helps show where Scott I. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott I. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott I. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Scott I. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997237
2 1973175
3 2002146
4 1996134
5 200577
6 199954
7 198939
8 198839
9
Computed tomographic features of tuboovarian abscess.
200531
10 200029
11 200628
12 198328
13 200527
14 200026
15 200726
16 198825
17 201225
18 199422
19 198720
20 200019

About Scott I. Fields

Scott I. Fields is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Reproductive Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (3 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (465 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (343 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (147 citations), Surgery (313 citations) and Emergency Medicine (59 citations). Scott I. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Floyd Dunn, Hadassa Degani, Shalom Strano, Daphna Weinstein, Oded Zamir, Herbert R. Freund, Shalom S. Buchbinder, Isaac S. Leichter, Eugene Libson and Tzeela Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Radiology, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Academic Radiology and Investigative Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact