Scott E. Wilks

1.3k citations
33 papers · 923 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Resilience and Mental Health 10
    • Health disparities and outcomes 8
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 5

Scott E. Wilks

31 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Scott E. Wilks
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Clinical Psychology 553
  • Public Administration 67
  • Health 132
  • Family Practice 32
  • Transplantation 39
Replace Melissa Pencille with:
Melissa Pencille United States
Jennifer B. Blossom United States
John Fowler United States
Nancy Diekelmann United States
Judy Hughes Canada
Urban Markström Sweden
Pamela M. Ironside United States
Catherine Hungerford Australia
Sylvia Shellenberger United States
Dawn Forman Australia
Scott E. Wilks relative to Melissa Pencille United States Melissa Pencille's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.4×
Melissa Pencille · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Wilks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Wilks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Wilks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Wilks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Wilks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Wilks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Wilks. The network helps show where Scott E. Wilks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Scott E. Wilks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott E. Wilks Line = papers co-authored together Scott E. Wilks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008202
2 2009182
3 2008179
4 200956
5 201155
6 200432
7 200831
8 200821
9 201017
10 201417
11 201815
12 201712
13 201110
14 20179
15 20049
16 20109
17 20168
18 20188
19 20067
20 20067

About Scott E. Wilks

Scott E. Wilks is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (4 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (553 citations), Public Administration (67 citations), Health (132 citations), Family Practice (32 citations) and Transplantation (39 citations). Scott E. Wilks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bangladesh and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Christina A. Spivey, Marie A. Chisholm‐Burns, M. Elizabeth Vonk, Samantha Bates, Daphne S. Cain, Graham J. McDougall, Michael W. Parker, Nancy P. Kropf, Stacey Kolomer and Terri Lewinson. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Social Work Practice, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Social Work Education, Aging & Mental Health and The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact