Scott E. Provost

23 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Scott E. Provost
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 233
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 34
  • General Health Professions 82
  • Epidemiology 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
Replace Kara Zamora with:
Kara Zamora United States
Neil Kirschner United States
Anne Bukten Norway
Erin Bagalman United States
Amy Werremeyer United States
Alison Firemark United States
Anne E. Kovas United States
Brandi P. Cotton United States
Rogelio Altisent Spain
Dawn Lindsay United States
Scott E. Provost relative to Kara Zamora United States Kara Zamora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Kara Zamora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Provost

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Provost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Provost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Provost more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Provost

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Provost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Provost. The network helps show where Scott E. Provost may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott E. Provost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott E. Provost Line = papers co-authored together Scott E. Provost links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015116
2 201069
3 200058
4 200449
5 201544
6 201438
7 200628
8 201023
9 200322
10 201014
11 201913
12 20007
13 20075
14 20154
15 20223
16 20182
17 20062
18 19992
19 20032
20 20251

About Scott E. Provost

Scott E. Provost is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (233 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (34 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations), Epidemiology (90 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (31 citations). Scott E. Provost has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger D. Weiss, Richard C. Hermann, Margaret L. Griffin, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Jennifer Sharpe Potter, Jessica A. Dreifuss, Dorian R. Dodd, K. Mcdermott, Wai Tat Chiu and Jeffrey Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Contemporary Clinical Trials, American Journal on Addictions, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact