Scott E. Maxwell
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Advanced Statistical Methods and Models 22
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 16
- Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference 14
- Statistical Methods and Inference 10
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 14
- Co-authors
- David A. Cole (29 shared papers)Harold D. Delaney (23 shared papers)George S. Howard (34 shared papers)Ken Kelley (9 shared papers)Melissa A. Mitchell (2 shared papers)G. H. Freeman (1 shared paper)Stephen M. Quintana (3 shared papers)Ronald C. Serlin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychological Methods (20 papers)Psychological Bulletin (20 papers)Journal of Applied Psychology (12 papers)Journal of Educational Psychology (12 papers)Multivariate Behavioral Research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Scott E. Maxwell
176 papers receiving 18.9k citations
Scott E. Maxwell's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Applied Psychology 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.1k
- Clinical Psychology 4.6k
- Social Psychology 4.5k
- Statistics and Probability 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Maxwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Maxwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Maxwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Maxwell. The network helps show where Scott E. Maxwell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott E. Maxwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Testing Mediational Models With Longitudinal Data: Questions and Tips in the Use of Structural Equation Modeling. Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 2804 |
| 2 | Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 2267 |
| 3 | Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 1057 |
| 4 | Bias in Cross-Sectional Analyses of Longitudinal Mediation: Partial and Complete Mediation Under an Autoregressive Model Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 1016 |
| 5 | Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, Third Edition Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 736 |
| 6 | Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 644 |
| 7 | Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 609 |
| 8 | Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 525 |
| 9 | On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 480 |
| 10 | 2004 | 440 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 437 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 401 | |
| 13 | Internal Invalidity in Pretest-Posttest Self-Report Evaluations and a Re-evaluation of Retrospective Pretests Hit paper breakdown → | 1979 | 373 |
| 14 | 2007 | 351 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 344 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 337 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 328 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 278 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 275 | |
| 20 | Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 268 |
About Scott E. Maxwell
Scott E. Maxwell is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 20.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (22 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (16 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (15 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (4.6k citations), Social Psychology (4.5k citations) and Statistics and Probability (1.7k citations). Scott E. Maxwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include David A. Cole, Harold D. Delaney, George S. Howard, Ken Kelley, Melissa A. Mitchell, G. H. Freeman, Stephen M. Quintana, Ronald C. Serlin, Michael Y. Lau and James Bray. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Methods, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology and Multivariate Behavioral Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.