Scott D. Cramer

4.5k citations
72 papers · 3.3k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Scott D. Cramer

70 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Scott D. Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Cancer Research 693
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 782
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 411
  • Oncology 594
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
Replace Tomoaki Fujioka with:
Tomoaki Fujioka Japan
Adriaan P. de Bruı̈ne Netherlands
Woo Sung Moon South Korea
Jesús M. Bañales Spain
Yun‐Yong Park South Korea
Susumu Ohwada Japan
Maréne Landström Sweden
Yusuke Mizukami Japan
Zhiyong Guo China
Pei‐Yi Chu Taiwan
Scott D. Cramer relative to Tomoaki Fujioka Japan Tomoaki Fujioka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Tomoaki Fujioka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Cramer. The network helps show where Scott D. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott D. Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Scott D. Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016261
2 2014255
3 2010205
4 1996156
5 2004145
6
25-Hydroxyvitamin D3, the prohormone of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, inhibits the proliferation of primary prostatic epithelial cells.
2000110
7 2004106
8 2011103
9 200593
10 200489
11 200486
12 201372
13 200471
14 200369
15 200965
16 201561
17 200555
18 200255
19 201554
20 200453

About Scott D. Cramer

Scott D. Cramer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (15 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (9 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (7 papers), Bone health and treatments (6 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (693 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (782 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (411 citations), Oncology (594 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.4k citations). Scott D. Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donna M. Peehl, Wendy W. Barclay, Ralph D. Woodruff, Lina Romero, Jianfeng Xu, Guangchao Sui, Andrew Thorburn, Anuradha Rao, Zuxiong Chen and M. Craig Hall. Their work appears in journals such as The Prostate, Endocrinology, Cancer Research, Molecular Cancer Research and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact