Scott D. Bender

12 papers receiving 128 citations

Peers

Scott D. Bender
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Emergency Medicine 34
  • Epidemiology 104
  • Family Practice 4
  • Clinical Psychology 39
  • Neurology 25
Replace Katrin Cunitz with:
Katrin Cunitz Germany
Daniel W. Klyce United States
Nathan Ernst United States
Esther Ngan United States
David B. Freeman United States
Carl T. Rimmele United States
Sandra Brown United States
Heidi Losoi Finland
Margaret Weiser Canada
Michael J. C. Bray United States
Scott D. Bender relative to Katrin Cunitz Germany Katrin Cunitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Katrin Cunitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Bender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Bender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Bender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Bender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Bender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Bender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Bender. The network helps show where Scott D. Bender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Bender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott D. Bender Line = papers co-authored together Scott D. Bender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200431
2 201121
3 201317
4 200315
5 200914
6 197011
7
Neuropsychological models of feigned cognitive deficits.
20189
8 20116
9 20195
10 20234
11 20011
12 20181
13 20240

About Scott D. Bender

Scott D. Bender is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (1 paper) and Genetic and rare skin diseases. (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (34 citations), Epidemiology (104 citations), Family Practice (4 citations), Clinical Psychology (39 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Scott D. Bender has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Rogers, Richard Rogers, Christopher M. Bailey, Jeffrey T. Barth, Richard I. Frederick, Nathan D. Zasler, James J. Mahoney, James R. Merikangas, Bernice A. Marcopulos and Daniel C. Murrie. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Injury and Law, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Behavioral Sciences & the Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact