Scott Chadwick
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Safety Research top 2%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Papers in
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 21
- Genetics 16
- Forensic and Genetic Research 16
- Co-authors
- Claude Roux (21 shared papers)Xanthe Spindler (12 shared papers)Sébastien Moret (18 shared papers)Chris Lennard (9 shared papers)Philip Maynard (4 shared papers)K. Paul Kirkbride (3 shared papers)Marie Morelato (10 shared papers)Andrew M. McDonagh (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International (21 papers)Science & Justice (2 papers)Forensic Chemistry (2 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (1 paper)Foundations of Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Scott Chadwick
37 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Library and Information Sciences 44
- Safety Research 243
- Toxicology 28
- Information Systems 151
- Genetics 184
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Chadwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Chadwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Chadwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Chadwick. The network helps show where Scott Chadwick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Chadwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 11 | Assessing Institutional Support for Service-Learning: A Case Study of Organizational Sensemaking | 2007 | 11 |
| 12 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 13 | Perspective-taking in Structured and Unstructured Online Discussions | 2010 | 9 |
| 14 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 7 |
About Scott Chadwick
Scott Chadwick is a scholar working on Safety Research, Genetics, Information Systems, Organic Chemistry and Education, having authored 43 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (21 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (16 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (9 papers), Wood and Agarwood Research (7 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (4 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (3 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (3 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (44 citations), Safety Research (243 citations), Toxicology (28 citations), Information Systems (151 citations) and Genetics (184 citations). Scott Chadwick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Claude Roux, Xanthe Spindler, Sébastien Moret, Chris Lennard, Philip Maynard, K. Paul Kirkbride, Marie Morelato, Andrew M. McDonagh, Linda Xiao and Alison Beavis. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Science & Justice, Forensic Chemistry, Drug and Alcohol Review and Foundations of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.