Scott Bokemper
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 4
- Media Influence and Politics 3
- Health 6
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 6
- Co-authors
- Saad B. Omer (7 shared papers)Gregory A. Huber (10 shared papers)Alan S. Gerber (6 shared papers)Erin James (3 shared papers)Peter DeScioli (5 shared papers)Alan N. Simmons (1 shared paper)James H. Fowler (1 shared paper)Christopher T. Dawes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Vaccine (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Political Behavior (2 papers)American Politics Research (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandItaly
In The Last Decade
Scott Bokemper
15 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Health 158
- Modeling and Simulation 57
- General Decision Sciences 10
- Cognitive Neuroscience 99
- Sociology and Political Science 160
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Bokemper
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Bokemper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Bokemper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Bokemper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Bokemper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Bokemper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Bokemper. The network helps show where Scott Bokemper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Bokemper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 |
About Scott Bokemper
Scott Bokemper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations and Safety Research, having authored 17 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (158 citations), Modeling and Simulation (57 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (160 citations). Scott Bokemper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Saad B. Omer, Gregory A. Huber, Alan S. Gerber, Erin James, Peter DeScioli, Alan N. Simmons, James H. Fowler, Christopher T. Dawes, Peter John Loewen and Darren Schreiber. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Political Behavior, American Politics Research and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.