Scott Baum

16 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Scott Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Internal Medicine 108
  • Emergency Medicine 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 125
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
  • Genetics 39
Replace F.G. van den Berg with:
F.G. van den Berg Netherlands
J. J. Michiels Netherlands
Allyson M. Pishko United States
Chiara Ambaglio Italy
Bernt Ly Norway
Enric Montserrat Spain
Kaufman Sl United States
Jennifer E. Hamrick-Turner United States
M. Beckers Netherlands
Surbhi Shah United States
Scott Baum relative to F.G. van den Berg Netherlands F.G. van den Berg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
F.G. van den Berg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Baum. The network helps show where Scott Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Baum Line = papers co-authored together Scott Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1989124
2 199150
3 199148
4
Role of Genomic Instability in Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors.
201626
5 199224
6 202016
7 201615
8 20188
9 19914
10 20193
11 19902
12
Angiography in the diagnosis and treatment of nonvariceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension.
19742
13 20212
14
Initial results of the phase 1 portion of an ongoing phase 1/2 study of RP1 as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab in patients with solid tumors
20191
15 20171
16 20211
17 20230

About Scott Baum

Scott Baum is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Genetics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (108 citations), Emergency Medicine (74 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (125 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations) and Genetics (39 citations). Scott Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Timothy C. Fabian, EUGENE C. MANGIANTE, R. E. Gold, Kenneth A. Kudsk, Guy Voeller, Ina L.D. Tonkin, Thomas F. Boulden, L Britt, Martin A. Croce and Phillip George. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal of Digital Imaging, The American Journal of Surgery and Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact