Scott Barnes

33 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Scott Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Language and Linguistics 196
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 150
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 70
  • Occupational Therapy 20
Replace Mary Oelschlaeger with:
Mary Oelschlaeger United States
Hilary Gardner United Kingdom
Gloria Streit Olness United States
Mike Huiskes Netherlands
John A. Tetnowski United States
Ann Nockerts United States
Phyllis Schneider Canada
Anny Castilla-Earls United States
Maria Black United Kingdom
Gabriela Simon‐Cereijido United States
Scott Barnes relative to Mary Oelschlaeger United States Mary Oelschlaeger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Mary Oelschlaeger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Barnes. The network helps show where Scott Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Barnes Line = papers co-authored together Scott Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201842
2 201437
3 200932
4 201221
5 201919
6 202015
7 202014
8 201913
9 201213
10 201513
11 201112
12 201712
13 201410
14 201210
15 201910
16 20209
17 20169
18 20129
19 20208
20 20208

About Scott Barnes

Scott Barnes is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (28 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (17 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (14 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (196 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (70 citations) and Occupational Therapy (20 citations). Scott Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Ferguson, Steven Bloch, Niels Buus, Ben Ong, Elizabeth Armstrong, Lyndsey Nickels, Christopher N. Candlin, Emma Power, Leanne Togher and Suzanne Beeke. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Journal of Pragmatics, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Family Process and Research on Language and Social Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact