Scott Barnes

32 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Scott Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Language and Linguistics 182
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 136
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 67
  • Occupational Therapy 20
Replace Mary Oelschlaeger with:
Mary Oelschlaeger United States
Dana Kovarsky United States
Larry Boles United States
Gloria Streit Olness United States
Carolyn Bruce United Kingdom
Ann Nockerts United States
Hilary Gardner United Kingdom
Phyllis Schneider Canada
Christine E. Fiestas United States
Anny Castilla-Earls United States
Scott Barnes relative to Mary Oelschlaeger United States Mary Oelschlaeger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Mary Oelschlaeger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Barnes. The network helps show where Scott Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Barnes Line = papers co-authored together Scott Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201432
3 200930
4 201221
5 201919
6 202015
7 202014
8 201213
9 201912
10 201112
11 201512
12 201712
13 201410
14 201210
15 20209
16 20208
17 20198
18 20208
19 20128
20 20167

About Scott Barnes

Scott Barnes is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (27 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (13 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (182 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (95 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (136 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (67 citations) and Occupational Therapy (20 citations). Scott Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Ferguson, Steven Bloch, Ben Ong, Niels Buus, Elizabeth Armstrong, Christopher N. Candlin, Lyndsey Nickels, Emma Power, Leanne Togher and Suzanne Beeke. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Journal of Pragmatics, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Research on Language and Social Interaction and Family Process.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact