Family Process

88.6k citations
2.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
    • Family and Disability Support Research
    • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
    • Counseling Practices and Supervision

Papers in

    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 806
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 726
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 508
    • Family and Disability Support Research 285
    • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 979
    • Counseling Practices and Supervision 188

Family Process

2.7k papers receiving 75.5k citations

Peers

Family Process
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Clinical Psychology 54.1k
  • Social Psychology 31.3k
  • Demography 9.4k
  • Health 5.4k
  • Safety Research 4.2k
Replace Journal of Marital and Family Therapy with:
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy United States
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology United States
Family Relations United States
The Journal of Psychology United States
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry United States
The Journal of Social Psychology United States
International Journal of Intercultural Relations United States
Journal of Counseling & Development United States
International Journal of Behavioral Development United States
Sex Roles United States
Family Process relative to Journal of Marital and Family Therapy United States Journal of Marital and Family Therapy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Family Process

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Family Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Family Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Family Process more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Family Process

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Family Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Family Process.

About Family Process

The 2.9k papers published in Family Process in the last decades have received a total of 88.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Family Process usually cover Clinical Psychology (2.0k papers), Social Psychology (1.3k papers), Demography (427 papers), Health (153 papers) and Safety Research (143 papers) specifically the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (979 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (806 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (726 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (508 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (414 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (285 papers), Family Support in Illness (206 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Family Process are Froma Walsh, Frank S. Pittman, David H. Olson, Karl Tomm, Douglas H. Sprenkle, Rachel T. Hare‐Mustin, Carlos E. Sluzki, Candyce S. Russell, Celia Jaes Falicov and John S. Rolland.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact