Scott A. Inks

15 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Scott A. Inks
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 209
  • Information Systems and Management 103
  • Accounting 105
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 90
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 12
Replace Gary L. Karns with:
Gary L. Karns United States
Rouxelle de Villiers New Zealand
Lynn Vos United Kingdom
Stacy E. Kovar United States
Ryan Langan United States
Shohreh A. Kaynama United States
Olayemi Abdullateef Aliyu New Zealand
Teresa G. Weldy United States
Dana Schwieger United States
Gladie Lui United States
Scott A. Inks relative to Gary L. Karns United States Gary L. Karns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gary L. Karns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Inks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Inks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Inks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Inks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Inks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Inks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Inks. The network helps show where Scott A. Inks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Scott A. Inks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott A. Inks Line = papers co-authored together Scott A. Inks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000171
2 200178
3 201424
4 200823
5 201916
6 201112
7 201811
8 202011
9 20066
10 20066
11 20025
12 20054
13 20203
14
An Evaluation of the Professionalization of Sales: A Call for New Measures of Profession and Professional
19953
15 20071

About Scott A. Inks

Scott A. Inks is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Marketing Education (9 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (2 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (209 citations), Information Systems and Management (103 citations), Accounting (105 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (90 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (12 citations). Scott A. Inks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Donna T. Mayo, L. Michelle Bobbitt, Amy J. Morgan, Ramon A. Avila, Terry W. Loe, Lukas P. Forbes, Marilyn M. Helms, Deborah Lester, Aberdeen Leila Borders and Shaheen Borna. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing Education, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Internet Commerce, Journal of Euromarketing and International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact